Mechanical deflection compensation for a capacitive touch input device

ABSTRACT

A location of contact with a touch sensitive device is determined. Output signals associated with a plurality of electrodes such as formed on a single layer of the touch sensitive device are measured to identify a first electrode positioned at an approximate location of contact with the touch sensor. An output signal associated with a different electrode that is separated from the first electrode is measured to determine an undesired signal amount, such as due to deflection. An undesired single amount associated with the first electrode may be estimated based on the undesired signal amount measured at the other electrode. The signal amount measured at the first electrode is then compensated by the estimated undesired signal amount. The location of contact with the touch sensor is then determined based on the compensated signal amount.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from commonly-assigned U.S. provisional patent application Nos. 61/426,421 and 61/426,344 filed on Dec. 22, 2010.

BACKGROUND

Capacitive touch input devices are utilized in a variety of applications. For example, transparent capacitive touch input devices placed in front of displays may be utilized with computers or portable devices to enable user interaction with displayed objects. Opaque capacitive touch input devices are used for track pads and other applications not requiring programmable displayed images behind the touch surface.

Capacitive touch input devices may include a touch sensitive electrode layer that enables determination of a point of contact such as over a display, at the location where a user touches the touch sensitive layer over the display. A group of sensing electrodes enable determining the X and Y location of the point of contact. The electrodes may be coupled to capacitance sensing circuitry including analog-to-digital converters that measure values associated with the electrodes, such as the capacitance, current, charge, impedance or voltage associated with the electrodes.

Many capacitive touch input devices use at least two electrode layers to measure two coordinates, e.g. (X, Y), of a touch location. For example, parallel sensing electrodes aligned along the X-axis formed on a first layer and parallel sensing electrodes aligned along the Y-axis formed on a different or second layer such that the electrodes on the first layer are formed orthogonally with respect to the electrodes on the second layer and form an overlapping matrix of addressable points of the touch sensor. Such two layer capacitive touch input devices provide good touch performance for many applications, but at increased manufacturing costs.

For some applications, a touch input device with a single electrode layer may provide adequate touch performance at a lower cost. However, single electrode layer touch devices tend to be more susceptible to certain sources of background interference as compared to two-electrode-layer capacitive input devices.

Stray capacitance between the sensing electrodes and the palm of the hand or other body parts of the user is one source of background interference. The ratio of undesired palm background signal to the desired finger touch signal increases as the thickness of the dielectric layer between electrodes and the touch surface increases.

Mechanical deflection of the touch device is another source of background interference. For example, touch induced pressure against the device may cause mechanical deflection between sensing electrodes and an underlying ground plane. For cost reduction reasons, it may be desirable to leave a small air gap (rather than more expensive optical bonding of potting adhesive) between the sensing electrodes and the underlying ground plane. Cost may be further reduced by eliminating extra ground or shield conductive planes between the sensing electrodes and underlying conductors. However, these cost saving measures weaken the electrode layer, making the electrode layer more susceptible to flexing when touched.

BRIEF SUMMARY

Methods, system, and computer readable media are provided for determining a location of contact with a touch sensitive device. A reference measurement determines an amount of undesired signal due to deformation or other undesired skewing. The amount of undesired signal is removed from the measurements for detecting location.

In a first aspect, the method may include measuring output signals associated with a plurality of electrodes of the touch sensitive device, the touch sensitive device comprising a single electrode layer device; and identifying a first electrode positioned at an approximate location of contact with the touch sensitive device. An output signal associated with a different electrode that is separated from the first electrode may be selected to determine an undesired signal amount. An undesired signal amount associated with the first electrode may be estimated based on the undesired signal amount measured at the other electrode. The signal amount measured at the first electrode may then be compensated by the estimated undesired signal amount. The location of contact with the touch pad may then be determined based on the compensated signal amount.

In a second aspect, a system is provided for determining a location of contact with a touch sensitive device. One or more analog-to-digital converters are configured to measure output signals associated with a plurality of electrodes. The electrodes include a first electrode and at least one other electrode that is separated from the first electrode by a distance. A processor is configured to identify a relative location of the first electrode when contact is made with the touch sensitive device approximately at the first electrode, estimate an undesired signal amount associated with the first electrode based on the undesired signal amount measured at the at least one other electrode, compensate a signal amount measured at the first electrode by the estimated undesired signal amount, and determine a location of contact based on the compensated signal amount.

In a third aspect, a non-transitory computer readable storage medium is provided. The storage medium includes instructions for determining a contact location based on capacitance measurement at a plurality of electrodes, estimating an amount of the capacitance measurements at the contact location due to mechanical deflection based on the capacitance measurements spaced away from a contact location; and accounting for the amount in the determining.

The present invention is defined by the following claims, and nothing in this section should be taken as a limitation on those claims. Further aspects and advantages of the invention are discussed below in conjunction with the preferred embodiments.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the claims, are incorporated in, and constitute a part of this specification. The detailed description and illustrated embodiments described serve to explain the principles defined by the claims.

FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary side view of a capacitive touch sensitive device;

FIG. 1B illustrates a top view of a first exemplary sensing electrode pattern of the capacitive touch sensitive device;

FIG. 1C illustrates a top view of a second exemplary sensing electrode pattern of the capacitive touch sensitive device;

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary system that may be utilized to determine a contact location;

FIG. 3 is an exemplary chart that illustrates analog-to-digital (ADC) measurements associated with electrodes arranged on a contact layer of the touch sensitive device;

FIG. 4 illustrates a first form of mechanical deflection that may occur when a contact layer of the touch sensitive device is pressed;

FIG. 5 illustrates example electrode measurements that may be processed when contact occurs on a right side of the contact layer;

FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary operations that may be utilized to compensate contact capacitance values for the effects of mechanical deflection;

FIG. 7 illustrates another form of mechanical deflection that may occur in a contact layer of a touch sensitive device;

FIG. 8 illustrates example electrode measurements that may be processed when contact occurs in the middle of the contact layer; and

FIGS. 9 a-9 d illustrate examples of added electrodes for the purpose of monitoring mechanical deflection.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The embodiments below describe systems and methods that compensate for mechanical deflection in a touch sensitive device. In particular, output signals at electrodes of the touch sensitive device that are distanced away from a point of contact are measured to determine an amount of background capacitance associated with mechanical deflection at the distanced electrodes. An amount of background capacitance at the point of contact is then interpolated based on the measured background capacitance associated with the distanced electrodes. The interpolated background capacitance is then subtracted from the capacitance measured at the point of contact and a more accurate location of contact is determined.

FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary side view of a capacitive touch sensitive device 100. The touch sensitive device 100 includes a contact layer 102 and a ground plane 130. The contact layer 102 and ground plane 130 are separated by a distance D by a support structure 110. Additional, different, or fewer components may be provided. For example, additional support structures 110 are provided.

The ground plane 130 may correspond to a conductive material. In a specific embodiment such as where device 100 is a touchscreen, a transparent conductive ground plane 130 such as indium tin oxide (ITO) may be used. In some implementations, the ground plane 130 is formed as part of a display (not shown), such as a liquid crystal display, light emitting diode (LED) display, or a different type of display. In other embodiments such as where device 100 is a touch pad, the ground plane 130 may be any opaque conductive metal layer.

The contact layer 102 may be transparent or partially transparent. The contact layer 102 is may be glass, a plastic material, or a different transparent or opaque material having at least one conductive electrode layer, as described below.

A group of electrodes 105, (e.g., 8 electrodes) for determining a contact location may be positioned on a lower surface of the contact layer 102. The number of electrodes 105 may be increased or decreased to change the resolution of the determined contact location. The electrodes 105 may correspond to a single layer of transparent conductive electrodes that extend in a Y-axis direction from one side of the contact layer 102 to an opposite side along the plane such that electrodes 105 do not overlap. In a specific embodiment, the single layer may be the only electrode layer, without other layers of sensing electrodes and/or without overlapping electrodes within the plane of the contact layer 102. However, in alternative embodiments, the electrodes 105 may be on one layer as part of a multi-layer (e.g., two-layer) electrode pattern in which an orthogonal set of electrodes is in another plane.

The electrodes 105 are deposited, bonded, or otherwise formed on the contact layer 102. The electrodes 105 may be made of a material, such as ITO, thin metallic films, carbon nanotubes, silver nanowires and intrinsically conductive polymers, which may be transparent. For opaque applications electrodes 105 may be of any conducting material including copper, other metals, and conductive composite polymers containing carbon or metal particles.

Each electrode 105 may interact with the ground plane 130 to form a capacitor 135. The value of the capacitor may be directly related (e.g., inversely proportional) to the air-gap distance D between the contact layer 102 and the ground plane 130. The electrodes 105 may be parallel to one another and may be evenly distributed across the lower surface of the contact layer 102. Other spacing, non-parallel alignment, extents and/or patterns may be used in other embodiments.

FIGS. 1B and 1C illustrate respective top views of different exemplary sensing electrode patterns that may be utilized with the capacitive touch sensitive device 100, according to specific embodiments. Referring to FIG. 1B, the electrodes 105 a may be generally triangular shaped and may be arranged in an alternating configuration, such as the so-called “backgammon” electrode pattern such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,297,811 or in U.S. published patent applications 20100295814 or 20100295813, which are hereby incorporated by reference. This type of electrode pattern provides coordinate sensing electrodes on a single layer. The vertical coordinate of a contact location may be determined by the fraction of the touch signal measured at the odd numbered triangular electrodes (e.g., 1, 3, 5, and 7) while the horizontal coordinate of the contact location is determined by the distribution of the touch signal as a function of electrode number, for example, by a mean, median or maximum of the distribution. For good touch performance, it is desirable that the triangular electrodes be sufficiently narrow and numerous so that a typical finger touch contact area overlaps several different electrodes. FIG. 1B is a conceptual illustration in which the width of the electrodes 105 a is exaggerated and then number of electrodes is much smaller than more typical numbers in the 50 to 200 range. In some applications it may be desirable to limit the number of electronic channels for cost reasons, in which case systems can be designed so that more than one electrode is electrically connected to each electronic channel, for example electrodes 3, 5 and 7 could be connected to one electronic channel and electrodes 6 and 8 to the next electronic channel.

Referring to FIG. 1C, the electrodes 105 b may be arranged in a so-called “binary” pattern, such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/780,077, which is hereby incorporated by reference. This type of electrode pattern provides coordinate sensing electrodes only on a single layer. Each numbered and lettered segment corresponds to an electrode 105 b. Electrodes or segments 105 b with the same number or letter may be electrically connected together for an electronic channel either via small interconnect traces (not shown) within the pattern or via interconnections in associated cabling or printed circuit boards (not shown). The horizontal coordinate of the contact location is determined via those electrodes 105 b that extend the full height of the touch area (electrodes 1, 2, . . . , 8). The vertical coordinate is determined via the lettered electrodes (A, B, . . . , H). The vertical coordinate may be represented by a binary code, such as a 4-bit binary code for a specific embodiment, where each bit of the code is associated with a given column of vertical coordinate electrodes 105 b and the value of each bit indicates which of the two vertical coordinate electrodes in a given column has the strongest capacitance measurement signal. For example, the 0 value of the least significant bit of the pattern 0010 may indicate that the electrode measurement associated with electrode B is smaller than electrode A. The value 1 of the second lowest order bit may indicate that the electrode measurement associated with electrode D is larger than electrode C. The value of the second highest order bit of the pattern 0010 and the most significant bit may indicate the relative measurements for electrodes E and F, and for electrodes G and H, respectively. Additional bits of vertical coordinate information can be provided by having additional columns of more finely segmented electrodes.

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary system 200 that may be utilized to determine the contact location. The system 200 includes a processor 202, a memory 215, and an analog-to-digital converter 205 (ADC). The ADC 205 and associated analog electronics may be utilized to measure capacitance values associated with the electrodes 105 and any other sensing electrodes in the capacitive input device. For example, the electrodes 105 may be coupled to the ADC 205. The ADC 205 may have a resolution of 8, 16, or 32 bits, according to specific embodiments. The resolution of the ADC 205 may be different and may be suited to a particular need. A multiplexer or other switching device allows the ADC 205 to measure separately at each electrode along the respective axis. Alternatively, one ADC measures a first group of electrodes and a different ADC is provided for measuring a different group of electrodes.

The processor 202 is in communication with the ADC 205 and is configured to analyze the capacitance values measured by the ADC 205 to determine a contact location of the contact layer 102. The processor 202 may correspond to an ARM®, Intel®, AMD®, PowerPC® processor, or a different processor. The processor 202 may include or be in communication with the memory 215. The memory 215 may be a random-access memory, read-only memory, programmable memory, or a different type of non-transitory memory. The memory 215 may store instruction code to be executed by the processor for carrying out operations including any operations described herein. The instruction code configures the processor 202 for operation by being provided in the memory prior to use and/or by being loaded into the processor 202 during operation. The memory 215 may also store various parameters utilized in determining a contact location of the contact layer 102. Other information may be stored in the memory 215. The respective components 202, 205, and 215 may all be contained in a single chip, or each could be a separate electronic component, or a combination thereof.

FIG. 3 is an exemplary chart 300 that illustrates ADC measurements associated with the electrodes 105 arranged on the contact layer 102. The electrodes 105 are represented along the X-axis of the chart 300. For example, electrode 0 represents the left-most electrode of the contact layer 102. Electrode 7 represents the right-most electrode of the contact layer 102. The Y-axis represents the magnitude of the ADC measurements taken for a given electrode 105. The measurements may correspond to ADC readings associated with the capacitance of a given electrode 105.

In the exemplary chart, capacitance associated with electrodes 0, 1, and 5-7 is at or near a baseline capacitance value 310. The baseline capacitance value 310 is measured when no object is in the vicinity of a respective electrode. The baseline capacitance value 310 measured in this instance indicates that no object is in the vicinity of electrodes 0, 1, and 5-7. Different electrodes may have the same or different baseline in specific embodiments. The baseline may be calibrated or preprogrammed. The baseline may be associated with a range of values below a given level. In the discussion that follows, it is assumed that the baseline values have already been removed.

Contact capacitance values 305, which are capacitance values greater than the baseline capacitance values 310, are measured from electrodes 2-4. The higher capacitance values measured at electrodes 2-4 indicate that an object, such as a user's finger, is in contact with the contact layer 102 in the vicinity of electrodes 2-4. The user's finger, being conductive, contributes to the capacitance at the electrodes even when there is no deflection or distance change caused between the electrodes 2-4 and the ground plane 130. In this instance, electrode 3 has the highest reading followed by electrode 4 and then electrode 2. The relative magnitudes of the readings indicate that the user's finger is somewhere in between electrodes 3 and 4. Had the measurements at electrodes 2 and 4 been the same, then the user's finger would have been directly over electrode 3. The processor 202 analyzes the various contact capacitance values 305 to determine the point at which the user contacts the contact layer 102.

The measurements shown in the exemplary chart 300 are somewhat ideal in that the contact layer 102 is considered to be a rigid material that does not exhibit mechanical deflection when pressed by the user. Single layer capacitive touch devices, in particular, tend to be more susceptible to diffuse or undesired signals measured over a large number of electrodes, such as those background signals associated with background objects, which is discussed in concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ (Attorney Docket ET-01067-US1), which is hereby incorporated by reference, and/or mechanical deflection. For example, referring to FIG. 10, a background signal associated with mechanical deflection measured at a given electrode may be small when compared to a signal associated with a contact. However, given the number and density of electrodes, the background signal may be measured over a relatively large number of electrodes. When these measurements are considered together, the magnitude of the overall background signal may be similar to that of a contact signal.

Given the size and weight constraints of modern devices that utilize touch sensitive displays, it may not be possible to utilize a material sufficiently rigid to prevent mechanical deflection. Instead, thinner materials, which may exhibit different degrees of mechanical deflection, may be utilized. When mechanical deflection of the contact layer 102 occurs, the assumptions above with respect to the contact location may need to be adjusted depending on the amount of deflection, because the change in distance between the electrodes and the ground plane causes inaccuracy of the capacitance measurements. Multi-layer devices also may not be ideal.

FIG. 4 illustrates a linear form of mechanical deflection that may occur when the contact layer 102 is pressed. In this form of mechanical deflection, the support structures 420 and 425 may deform depending on the location of contact 415, while layer 102 may be rigid. For example, a right-most support structure 425 may compress when the right side of the contact layer 102 is pressed. When this occurs, the capacitance values measured at the various electrodes may vary approximately linearly across the contact layer. For example, the change in capacitance 410 of the right-most electrode may be greater than the change in capacitance 405 of the left-most electrode because the change in the air-gap distance between the contact layer 102 and the ground plane 130 on the right side of the touch sensitive device 100 is smaller than the change in the distance between the contact layer 102 and the ground plane 130 on the left side of the touch sensitive device 100. The change in capacitance due to mechanical deflection may be expressed in matrix form as:

$\begin{bmatrix} {\Delta \; C_{0}} \\ {\Delta \; C_{1}} \\ {\Delta \; C_{2}} \\ {\Delta \; C_{3}} \\ {\Delta \; C_{4}} \\ {\Delta \; C_{5}} \\ {\Delta \; C_{6}} \\ {\Delta \; C_{7}} \end{bmatrix} = {{{{\frac{1}{7}\begin{bmatrix} 7 & 0 \\ 6 & 1 \\ 5 & 2 \\ 4 & 3 \\ 3 & 4 \\ 2 & 5 \\ 1 & 6 \\ 0 & 7 \end{bmatrix}}\begin{bmatrix} m_{0} \\ m_{7} \end{bmatrix}}\mspace{14mu} {or}\mspace{14mu} \Delta \; C_{i}} = {{\frac{1}{7}\left\lbrack {{\left( {7 - i} \right)m_{0}} + {im}_{7}} \right\rbrack}\mspace{14mu} {where}}}$ i = 0, …  , 7.

where ΔC_(i) is the change in the capacitance measured by electrode i due to mechanical deflection, and m₀ and m₇ are the capacitance changes measured at electrodes 0 and 7, which are assumed to have no capacitance component due to user contact. As noted above, the number of electrodes may be increased or decreased depending on the circumstances. The equation above may be modified accordingly. Other functions may be used, such as using an average, line fitting, or curve fitting for estimating the likely deflection capacitance at the contact layer electrodes based on measurements at other electrodes.

FIG. 5 illustrates electrode measurements that may be processed when the contact 415 occurs on the right side of the contact layer 102 and where the above-described mechanical deflection occurs. As described, contact capacitance values 500 may be measured from those electrodes in the vicinity of the contact 415. However, capacitance values associated with mechanical deflection 510 may be measured at the other electrodes. The hashed portion represents the mechanical deflection capacitance values 505 associated with each electrode. For electrodes 0-4, the mechanical deflection capacitance value 505 corresponds to the value measured 510. However, the contact capacitance values 500 measured for electrodes 5-7 include a component 507 that corresponds to the mechanical deflection capacitance value 505. As described earlier, the relative magnitudes of the contact capacitance values 500 are utilized to determine the point of contact. However, the mechanical deflection capacitance values 505 skew the measurements, making it difficult to determine the true point of contact.

FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary operations that may be utilized to determine the mechanical deflection component of the contact capacitance values, and thereby compensate the contact capacitance values for mechanical deflection of the contact layer 102. Instructions for implementing the operations below with the processor 202 may be stored in a computer-readable-medium, such as the memory 215 described above. Alternatively, hardware or both hardware and software are used to implement the operations. Additional, different, or fewer acts may be provided.

At block 600, the approximate location of contact may be determined. For example, signal amounts or values associated with all or a sub-set of the electrodes are analyzed to determine whether the signal amounts/values exceed a threshold 515 (FIG. 5). Electrodes associated with those values are then presumed to be in the vicinity of the contact. The capacitance measurements taken by those electrodes correspond to the contact capacitance.

At block 605, values at one or more electrodes 510 (FIG. 5) that are remote from the contact location are measured. For example, if electrodes 5-6 are determined to be near the point of contact, values at one or more of electrodes 0-4 may be measured. In some implementations, values at two electrodes 510 (e.g., electrodes 0 and 3 in the example of FIG. 5) not affected directly by the contact may be measured. The electrodes are presumed or selected to be far enough from the point of contact so that the contact itself rather than the deflection will not have a significant influence on the capacitance measured at these electrodes.

At block 610, the measurements associated with the remote electrodes 510 are processed according to the formula above or another formula to find the mechanical deflection capacitance values associated with all the electrodes. For example, the components 507 of the mechanical deflection capacitance values 505 that are part of the contact capacitance values 500 are determined or estimated.

At block 615, the contact capacitance values 500 (i.e., signal amounts measured from the electrodes at the location of contact) are adjusted to account for at least part of the deflection capacitance. The determined components 507 are subtracted from the measured contact capacitance values 500. Different amounts of subtraction may be provided for different electrodes. Even where the estimates are not exact, the correction may provide more accurate measurements.

At block 620, the compensated measurements are processed. The compensated measurements are then used to estimate the actual point or points of contact.

FIG. 7 illustrates another form of mechanical deflection that may occur in a contact layer 102 of a touch sensitive device 100 when a touch 415 is made. In this case, the contact layer 102, rather than the support structures 420 and 425, may deform. It may be shown that the mechanical deflection in the contact layer 102 approximates a symmetric parabolic arc between the two support structures 420 and 425. The resulting parabolic variation in background capacitance can be modeled by the following formula:

${{\Delta \; C_{i}} = {4\; S_{x}\frac{\left( {{2\; i} + 1} \right)\left( {{2\; N} - {2\; i} - 1} \right)}{\left( {2\; N} \right)^{2}}}},$

where S_(x) is a parameter proportional to the sagitta of the bend and N corresponds to the number of electrodes (in this case 8). Different structures may have different variations. Other formulas may be used to model the deflection of a given structure or structures. This form of mechanical deflection may approximate the parabolic arc regardless of the actual load location between structures 420 and 425, within about a 20% error range. Thus touch 415, shown toward the left portion of layer 102 may have a similar effect as for a touch located at the center of layer 102 between structures 420 and 425.

FIG. 8 illustrates electrode measurements that may be processed when the contact 415 occurs near the middle of the contact layer 102. As described above, contact capacitance values 800 may be measured from those electrodes in the vicinity of the contact 415. However, mechanical deflection capacitance values 810 may be measured at the other electrodes. The hashed portion 815 represents the amount of mechanical deflection capacitance present at each electrode. As described earlier, the relative magnitudes of the contact capacitance values 800 are utilized to determine the approximate point of contact. The components 805 of the contact capacitance values due to mechanical deflection may, therefore, be computed according to the parabolic or other formula above and utilized to compensate the contact capacitance values 800. For example, to determine S_(X), the contact region 420 of the contact layer 102 is first determined. The contact region 415 may be determined by identifying electrodes with capacitance measurements greater than a threshold 820.

Next, having identified contact region 415, electrodes are identified that are sufficiently remote from the contact region 415 so as to have small or zero signal from contact capacitance values 800. In some implementations, the most central electrode away from the contact region 415 may result in the best deflection measurement. For example, assuming the contact occurs in the vicinity of electrodes 2, 3, and 4 (values 800), electrode or channel 5 (value 810) may be considered as the most central electrode. Applying the above equation of ΔC_(i) to electrode or channel 5 (value 800), the parameter S_(x) is determined to be:

$S_{x} = {{\frac{\Delta \; C_{5}}{4}\frac{\left( {2 \times 8} \right)^{2}}{\left( {{2 \times 5} + 1} \right)\left( {{2 \times 8} - {2 \times 5} - 1} \right)}} = {\frac{\Delta \; C_{5}}{4}{\frac{16^{2}}{55}.}}}$

The value of S_(x) is determined from a measurement of ΔC_(i) for at least one electrode remote from the touch contact, and in some embodiments more than one electrode may be used, such as two adjacent electrodes or the two most central electrodes on different sides of the contact, allowing for non-uniform deflection. After S_(x) is determined, the components 805 of the contact capacitance values due to mechanical deflection capacitance may be subtracted from the measured contact capacitance values 800.

The principle of the previous two examples can be generalized. In some cases, it might be sufficient to model the air gap distance between the contact layer 102 and the ground plane 130 as a function of position using:

D(x,y)=D ₀−δ−τ_(x) ·x−τ _(y) ·y−σ _(x)(1−x ²)−σ_(y)(1−y ²)

where D₀ is initial distance of the air gap without deflection, δ is the spatially averaged rigid body deflection, τ_(x) and τ_(y) are the rigid body tilts in the x and y directions, and σ_(x) and σ_(y) are sagittas of flexing curvature in the x and y directions. Here, x and y are scaled to range from −1 to 1 over the contact area. The air gap between the electrode and the ground plane 130 may be important because it influences the touch signal capacitance calculated. If the air gap distance is D(x, y), the capacitance for an electrode i is then

$C_{i} = {\int\limits_{A_{i}}{\frac{ɛ}{D\left( {x,y} \right)}{x}{y}}}$

where the integral is over the electrode area A. The change in capacitance ΔC_(i) for each electrode i is:

${\Delta \; C_{i}} = {{\int\limits_{A_{i}}{{ɛ\left( {\frac{1}{D\left( {x,y} \right)} - \frac{1}{D_{0}}} \right)}{x}{y}}} = {\Delta \; {{C_{i}\left( {\delta,\tau_{x},\tau_{y},\sigma_{x},\sigma_{y}} \right)}.}}}$

Five measurements m_(A), m_(B), m_(C), m_(D), m_(E) may be needed to solve for the five unknown parameters δ, τ_(x), τ_(y), σ_(x), σ_(y). Accordingly, ΔC_(i) may be linearized to

$\begin{bmatrix} {\Delta \; C_{0}} \\ \vdots \\ {\Delta \; C_{N}} \end{bmatrix} = {{{\left\lbrack M_{1} \right\rbrack \begin{bmatrix} \delta \\ \tau_{x} \\ \tau_{y} \\ \sigma_{x} \\ \sigma_{y} \end{bmatrix}}\mspace{14mu} {{and}\mspace{14mu}\begin{bmatrix} \delta \\ \tau_{x} \\ \tau_{y} \\ \sigma_{x} \\ \sigma_{y} \end{bmatrix}}} = {\left\lbrack M_{2} \right\rbrack \begin{bmatrix} m_{A} \\ m_{B} \\ m_{C} \\ m_{D} \\ m_{E} \end{bmatrix}}}$

With the matrix M=M₁M₂ the following equation may be utilized.

$\begin{bmatrix} {\Delta \; C_{0}} \\ \vdots \\ {\Delta \; C_{N}} \end{bmatrix} = {\lbrack M\rbrack \begin{bmatrix} m_{A} \\ m_{B} \\ m_{C} \\ m_{D} \\ m_{E} \end{bmatrix}}$

Referring again to the operations in FIG. 6, at block 605 measurements of m_(A), m_(B), m_(C), m_(D), and m_(E) may be made. As in the two examples given above, these measurements might be based on signals from electrodes used to detect contact with the contact layer 102.

While various embodiments have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations may be possible that are within the scope of the claims. For example, referring to FIG. 9 a, the one or more of m_(A), m_(B), m_(C), m_(D), and m_(E) described above may correspond to electrodes specifically added for the purpose of measuring deflection rather than using the existing touch coordinate sensing electrodes. The arrangement of the electrodes may vary. For example, referring to FIGS. 9 a through 9 c, the conductive electrodes 905, such as elongate or pad-shaped electrodes, may be positioned around the periphery of the panel away from the viewing portion of the contact layer at corners and/or sides. Alternatively, the electrodes 910 which may be transparent conductive material may be arranged in the viewing area according to a specific embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 9 d.

In some implementations one or more strain gauges or different strain measuring devices may be utilized to measure mechanical deflection. For example, electrodes may be utilized to determine a contact location. Then the one or more strain gauges may be utilized to measure the mechanical deflection. The mechanical deflection measurements may then be utilized to compensate the electrode measurements described above.

Any model, such as accounting for two or more types of deflection at a same time, may be used. The choice of electrodes spaced away from the contact may be based on the likely types of deflection involved or may be sampled randomly or in a pattern in order to account for different types of deflection. The values at all electrodes not above the threshold may be used. The capacitance values may be low pass filtered over space and/or time to reduce the effects of noise.

Accordingly, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of the claims. Therefore, the embodiments described are only provided to aid in understanding the claims and do not necessarily limit the scope of the claims. 

1. A method for determining a location of contact with a touch sensitive device, the method comprising: measuring output signals associated with a plurality of electrodes of the touch sensitive device, the touch sensitive device comprising a single electrode layer device; identifying at least a first electrode, of the plurality, positioned at an approximate location of contact on the touch sensitive device; selecting an output signal associated with at least one other electrode that is separated from the first electrode by a distance, wherein an amount of signal measured at the at least one other electrode corresponds to an undesired signal amount; estimating an undesired signal amount associated with the first electrode based on the undesired signal amount measured at the at least one other electrode, wherein estimating an undesired signal amount comprises determining a capacitance associated with mechanical deflection of the touch sensitive device; adjusting a signal amount measured at the first electrode by the estimated undesired signal amount associated with the first electrode; and determining a location of contact based on the adjusted signal amount.
 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising measuring a first group of electrodes positioned at the approximate location of contact and compensating signal amounts measured at the first group of electrodes.
 3. The method according to claim 2, further comprising measuring a second group of electrodes separated from the first group of electrodes to estimate undesired signal amounts associated with the first group of electrodes.
 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection is determined as follows: ${\Delta \; C_{i}} = {\frac{1}{N}\left\lbrack {{\left( {N - i} \right)m_{o}} + {im}_{N}} \right\rbrack}$ where ΔC_(i) is the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection of an i_(th) electrode, N is a number of electrodes, i=0, . . . , N, and m₀ and m_(N) correspond to capacitance measurements of a first and an Nth electrode, respectively.
 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection is determined as follows: ${\Delta \; C_{i}} = {4\; S_{x}\frac{\left( {{2\; i} + 1} \right)\left( {{2N} - {2\; i} - 1} \right)}{\left( {2\; N} \right)^{2}}}$ where ΔC_(i) is the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection of an i_(th) electrode, N is a number of electrodes, i=0, . . . , n, where the value of S_(x) is determined from a measurement of ΔC_(i) for at least one electrode remote from the touch contact.
 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the touch sensitive device comprises a transparent surface and the electrodes are arranged on the transparent surface, the touch sensitive device surface is positioned over a display surface, and the location of contact corresponds to a location where a user touches the touch sensitive device.
 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the electrodes terminate along a peripheral edge of the touch sensitive device.
 8. The method according to claim 1, where the distance corresponds to a distance between two or more electrodes.
 9. A system for determining a location of contact with a touch sensitive device, the system comprising: one or more analog-to-digital converters configured to measure output signals associated with a plurality of electrodes, which include a first electrode and at least one other electrode that is separated from the first electrode by a distance; and a processor configured to: identify a relative location of the first electrode when contact is made with the touch sensitive device approximately at the first electrode; estimate an undesired signal amount associated with the first electrode based on the undesired signal amount measured at the at least one other electrode, wherein the undesired signal amount is generated by mechanical deflection of the touch sensitive device; compensate for a signal amount measured at the first electrode by the estimated undesired signal amount; and determine a location of contact based on the compensated signal amount.
 10. The system according to claim 9, wherein the one or more analog-to-digital converters are further configured to measure a first group of electrodes positioned at the approximate location of contact and the processor is further configured to compensate for signal amounts measured at the first group of electrodes.
 11. The system according to claim 10, wherein the one or more analog-to-digital converters are further configured to measure at a second group of electrodes separated from the first group of electrodes, and the processor is further configured to estimate an undesired signal amount associated with the first group of electrodes.
 12. The system according to claim 9, wherein the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection is determined as follows: ${\Delta \; C_{i}} = {\frac{1}{N}\left\lbrack {{\left( {N - i} \right)m_{o}} + {im}_{N}} \right\rbrack}$ where ΔC_(i) is the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection of an i_(th) electrode, N is a number of electrodes, i=0, . . . , N, and m₀ and m_(N) correspond to capacitance measurements of a first and an Nth electrode, respectively.
 13. The system according to claim 9, wherein the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection is determined as follows: ${\Delta \; C_{i}} = {4\; S_{x}\frac{\left( {{2\; i} + 1} \right)\left( {{2N} - {2\; i} - 1} \right)}{\left( {2\; N} \right)^{2}}}$ where ΔC_(i) is the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection of an i_(th) electrode, N is a number of electrodes, i=0, . . . , n, where the value of S_(x) is determined from a measurement of ΔC_(i) for at least one electrode remote from the touch contact.
 14. The system according to claim 9, wherein the touch sensitive device comprises a transparent surface and the electrodes are arranged on the transparent surface, the touch sensitive device surface is positioned over a display surface, and the location of contact corresponds to a location where a user touches the touch sensitive device.
 15. The system according to claim 9, wherein the electrodes terminate along a peripheral edge of the touch sensitive device.
 16. The system according to claim 9, where the distance corresponds to a distance between two or more electrodes.
 17. In a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored therein data representing instructions executable by a programmed processor for determining a location of contact with a touch sensitive device, the storage medium comprising instructions for: determining a contact location based on capacitance measurement at a plurality of electrodes; estimating an amount of the capacitance measurements at the contact location due to mechanical deflection based on the capacitance measurements spaced away from a contact location; and accounting for the amount in the determining.
 18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 18 wherein estimating comprises: comparing the capacitance measurements to a threshold; selecting one of the electrodes as near the contact location where the capacitance measurement is over the threshold; selecting another of the electrodes as spaced from the contact location where the capacitance measurement is below the threshold; determining the amount based on the capacitance measurement below the threshold; and wherein accounting comprises subtracting the amount from the capacitance measurement over the threshold and determining the contact location based on the capacitance measurement over the threshold minus the amount.
 19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection is determined as follows: ${\Delta \; C_{i}} = {\frac{1}{2}\left\lbrack {{\left( {N - i} \right)m_{o}} + {im}_{N}} \right\rbrack}$ where ΔC_(i) is the capacitance associated with mechanical deflection of an i_(th) electrode, N is a number of electrodes, i=0, . . . , N, and m₀ and m_(N) correspond to capacitance measurements of a first and an Nth electrode, respectively.
 20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the touch sensitive device comprises a transparent surface and the electrodes are arranged on the transparent surface, the touch sensitive device surface is positioned over a display surface, and the location of contact corresponds to a location where a user touches the touch sensitive device. 